top of page
DNA1.jpg

TM

Multi-cancer Early Detection by GeneSeeq Technologies

AdobeStock_606895568.jpeg

Cancer Coverage

24 Tissues of Origin with up to 59 cancer sub-classes

Tissue of Origin
Cancer
Hematopoetic
Leukemia
Hematopoetic
Myeloma, Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Disorders

Sensitivity & Specificity

CanScan by GeneSeeq has a 79%, 87%, 92%, and 97% sensitivity for detecting Stage I, II, III, and IV cancers respectfully with 97.8% specificity upon independent validation.

Sensitivity is the % chance of picking up cancer with the screening test if the individual has cancer.

(True positive rate)

Specificity is the % chance of a negative test result if the individual does not have cancer.

(True negative rate)

GeneSeeq, American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting April 2024

Case-controlled Cohort Validation Study

CanScan was validated with case-controlled cohort analysis with both Internal and Independent testing for assessment of Sensitivity and Specificity.

GeneSeeq, American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting April 2024

Overall Performance

GeneSeeq Sensivities by Cancer Stage.jpg

Stage

GeneSeeq, American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting April 2024

CanScan vs. "Conventional Screening"

A Prospective "Jinling" Cohort Study also in-progress for further clinical validation as well as comparison vs. conventional physical/clinical screening modalities.

GeneSeeq Best Practice Screening 1.jpg

    In this case the "Physical Exam / Conventional Screening" represents existing "Best Practice" (which is considerably more aggressive than typical Canadian medical screening standards and practices in general): using screening methods including Liver Ultrasound/AFP for liver cancer, Kidney Ultrasound for Kidney cancer, Pap for cervical cancer, Breast ultrasound for breast cancer, PSA for prostate cancer, FIT for intestinal cancer, CT for lung cancer, ultrasound and CT for pancreatic cancer.  These methods can additively yield a high false positive rate.

GeneSeeq, American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting April 2024

CanScan vs. "Conventional Screening"

Preliminary results in year 1, age 45-75

GeneSeeq Early Detection.jpg

CanScanTP prospective cohort, SEER cancer incidence 1975-2021, CHINA multi-center observational study PMID: 34838194

Preliminary results from the prospective cohort study (N=3724, with recruitment target of 15,000) are promising for the Early Detection of Cancer with the majority (87.5%) of the cancers being found in Stage I and II compared to historical SEER data, and to "Conventional Screening" data.  

Early Detection confers the opportunity for high rates of cancer remission and survival.

GeneSeeq, American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting April 2024

Ongoing Studies

The ongoing prospective study with CanScan to 2027 will also determine whether false positives are in fact non-cancerous cases, or whether CanScan is so sensitive that it would front-run conventional scanning technology by a number of years.

Hear the Clarion Call.

Give your self, your loved ones, and your employees the gift of foresight. 

bottom of page